Page 52 of 64: businesses ranked 5101-5200 of 6356. Ranked by score and relevance, start from the top or open the full map view.
Split reviews reveal an inconsistency: some guests praise cleanliness and comfort close to town; others found leaking kitchen floor, toilet, and sink, plus poor pre-arrival turnover. Evidence is thin.
Reviewers consistently praise cleanliness and hospitable hosts at this small beachfront homestay in George Town. Limited recent review data; evidence comes from four reviews spanning seven years.
Mixed reviews reflect variable stays. One guest with young children praised the friendly host Ali, affordable rates, and nearby food and shops; others left brief, non-committal notes. Limited recent detail makes a fuller picture hard to draw.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Two older reviews offer limited insight. One guest found the place comfortable; another praised value for money. The 4.0 rating sits below the beachfront category average of 4.59, though evidence is sparse.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Both guests reported serious maintenance problems: broken lights, leaking kitchen tap, non-working water heater and hair dryer, poor WiFi, and dirty utensils. Review evidence is limited to two one-star assessments both citing the need for better upkeep and cleanliness.
Both reviewers praised the clean, comfortable rooms and abundance of in-house facilities. Evidence is limited to two five-star reviews, so take the strong praise with some caution.
All reviewers rated this homestay five stars and praised the cleanliness, comfort, and central location between Kangar and Wan Kelian. The host (Mrs. Atirah) stands out for her personal attention, offering home-cooked treats and fruit from the garden; guests value the calm surroundings and competitive pricing.
Reviews split between comfort and value. Half praise the rooms; others report discomfort and pricing complaints. Limited detail in recent feedback.
Limited review detail available. Rating split evenly between strong support and poor experiences. Older reviews mention good location and welcome; recent history unclear.
Papa Homestay draws mixed reactions. Guests appreciate its position between Lumut and Teluk Batik, though the limited recent feedback makes it hard to gauge current standards.
Only one review available; insufficient evidence to establish consistent patterns. The business is located in Wakaf Bharu and their website lists basic homestay facilities including two bedrooms, kitchen equipment, and a washing machine. Additional context comes from their stated proximity to markets, beaches, and healthcare services.
Mixed reviews across a small sample. Guests appreciate the quiet village atmosphere, but limited mobile coverage and dependence on a car are real drawbacks for those without transport or needing reliable connectivity.
Both reviewers rated this studio highly, with one highlighting its proximity to a theme park as ideal for visitors. Evidence is thin: only two five-star reviews, each minimal in detail.
Happy families praise the space, cleanliness, and value for 10+ people. The owner Yana draws loyalty from those seeking homestay independence, not hotel service. However, one guest reported overbooking (5 people on floors), misleading photos, exaggerated distance to beaches, and intimidating host conduct when issues arose.
Guests find reasonable rates and clean, spacious rooms that feel homely, but service friction mars the stay. Phone lines stay busy, the caretaker's attitude can disappoint, and beds need upgrading; those who connect well praise staff warmth and budget comfort.
Split reviews over several years offer limited current insight. Two five-star ratings praise cleanliness, affordability, and available amenities, but the 50% one/two-star reviews suggest recurring problems that the older praise does not address.
Split ratings reflect inconsistent experience. One reviewer found facilities old and some amenities broken; another was satisfied. Limited evidence suggests location appeal but maintenance questions.
Guests consistently report hidden charges, questionable deposit practices, and a lack of basic maintenance. Newer reviews describe unsanitary conditions, broken air conditioning, and staff rushing guests out before checkout. The location near shopping and dining is noted, and some older reviews mention spacious rooms suitable for groups, but maintenance and management issues dominate recent feedback.
Guests praise the comfort and condition of rooms, but one reviewer flagged outdated or worn facilities. With only 6 reviews spanning several years, the picture is limited.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Reviewers give mixed ratings across a decade, with praise for location accessibility but sparse detail on what the stay actually offers. Review evidence is thin and outdated, making it hard to assess current conditions or services.
Reviewers report serious cleanliness issues including dust, dirt, rats, and foul smells, alongside a confrontational owner who gets angry at complaints. A few older positive reviews praise affordability and calm village atmosphere, but recent feedback is dominated by poor maintenance and hostile customer treatment.
Guests find the place clean and family-friendly, with good access to shops and hospitals near Seri Manjung. Air conditioning works in shared areas and front rooms, but the back bedroom lacks cooling and becomes uncomfortable in heat.
One guest praised the host's warmth and charm; others reported missing wifi and bedbug bites. Review evidence spans six to eight years; recent feedback is limited.
Tasnim sits on the beach in Bachok but runs inconsistently. Some guests praise spacious rooms and family suitability; others report broken items, poor cleaning, and air conditioning that does not cool well. Mixed experiences across the board.
Evidence of guest experiences is limited: one reviewer noted appliance issues, while another appeared satisfied. More recent feedback would clarify the current state of maintenance and service.
Four reviews offer limited insight. One guest described the setting as calm with strong winds and noted service; another mentioned exploring. Ratings range from 3 to 5 stars, suggesting middling satisfaction without clear patterns.
Limited review data. One recent guest noted a location update to Sg Lalng, Kedah. An older complaint cited difficulty reaching the business by phone.
Mixed guest experiences: two reviewers found the place acceptably furnished, but one detailed significant issues including broken air conditioning, a burst water tank, ineffective mosquito netting, dust accumulation, and no working kitchen or TV. Evidence is limited to three reviews across six years.
Guests praise the quiet rice field views and peaceful surroundings, but cleanliness between occupants is inconsistent. Previous tenant belongings, old soap, and missing basics like fresh towels and trash bins have frustrated visitors.
Zas Homestay has polarised guest feedback over recent years. Reviewers who rated it highly cited good value and suitability for families, though older reviews offer limited detail on specific strengths or weaknesses.
Guests have mixed experiences. Older reviews praise comfortable rooms and facilities, but a recent one-star rating flags an uncomfortable mattress, unhelpful owner, and Google Maps pin placed incorrectly. Evidence is limited and reviews span several years.
Most guests find the accommodation comfortable and well-suited to their needs. One complaint about neighboring guests and parking suggests that shared-space etiquette can be uneven.
Most guests describe Taman Bertam Aman as safe and tranquil, though one visitor complained of poor hallway lighting during a rainy night.
Mixed results across 11 reviews. Some guests found the space clean and well-organized with fair pricing, while others flagged inconsistent cleanliness and inadequate cooking gear. Safety was a plus.
One early guest reported a good visit in 2019, but a later reviewer encountered staff dishonesty about pool access. Review evidence is limited and mixed; no detail available on current conditions.
Space and setting draw interest, but cleanliness failures and pest problems have driven away guests. Limited recent data; the single positive review also flags cleaning lapses as the main issue holding this property back.
Recent guests report severe cleanliness issues: stained sheets, bathroom odours, spider webs, and lizard droppings throughout. Listing photos do not match the property's actual condition.
One guest praised the furnishings but noted towel storage could improve. Another felt the room didn't justify the asking price, suggesting inconsistent quality or expectations.
Some guests find the place easy to work with and appreciate discounts offered. Review evidence is limited, and ratings range from five stars to one or two, leaving the overall experience unclear.
Guests report serious maintenance failures: dirty carpets, holes in ceilings, spiders and ants throughout, broken furniture, and musty air. While the house itself is spacious with outdoor area, it is clearly not suitable for families or anyone concerned with cleanliness. Evidence is limited; only one full review is readable from the available data.
Guests found this beachfront homestay in Pasir Mas pleasant, though limited review evidence prevents deeper assessment of amenities.
Water and sanitation problems dominate complaints, with one guest waiting ten minutes to fill a bucket and toilets not flushing. While one reviewer praised comfort at a fair price, most recent feedback notes basic maintenance issues that persist across multiple facilities.
Most guests praise the comfort and value for money, with several mentioning spacious layouts and thoughtful amenities like air conditioning and laundry facilities. Limited recent feedback, but older reviews consistently highlight clean conditions and a quiet setting for relaxation.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Guests report significant shortfalls in basic facilities: dusty bedding, missing mirrors in rooms, no blankets or wifi, slow water, and absent supplies like toilet paper and tissues. Evidence is limited to negative reviews from two years ago.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
One guest praised the service, while another found it no better value than a budget hotel. With a 4.1-star average across just 7 reviews, the picture remains limited.
One reviewer had a three-day stay they found satisfactory; another raised concerns about payment processing and refunds, limiting confidence in the experience.
Reviews span from one to five stars with limited detail. Guests who were satisfied praised cleanliness and comfort; however, sparse written feedback makes a full picture hard to assess.
Two recent one-star reviews describe significant neglect: dirty rooms, torn flooring covers, small insects, and dangerous electrical work on fans. An older five-star review noted the space and service, but current evidence suggests the property has deteriorated badly since then.
One guest found the rooms spacious but the experience poor: air-con limited to the master bedroom, a broken kettle went unaddressed despite two days on-site, and no wifi or mobile signal made it uncomfortable. Limited review evidence.
Cenang Home Stay offers budget rooms near Langkawi's town centre, but reviews are sharply divided. While occasional guests praise the location and price, the majority report filthy rooms, broken air conditioning, bed bugs, and staff who ignore complaints or fail to answer calls. Even recent bookings mention 1-hour waits for contact and zero follow-up after checkout problems. Misleading photos and false claims about amenities (closed pool, non-included transfers) add to frustration.
One reviewer reported serious problems with building elevators (only one functioning properly out of three) and felt the space was cramped despite low occupancy. Evidence is very limited: a single two-star review from three years ago.
Multiple guests praise the low price and comfortable space for families, but a recent one-star review highlights serious maintenance failures: water bills went unpaid during their stay, leaving no supply at morning, forcing an early checkout for a wedding. Friendly ownership does not offset inconsistent property upkeep.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Early reviews praised the owner and comfort, but a detailed later account flagged misleading photos, a non-flushing toilet, broken washing machine, and dirty porch. The rating dropped sharply after that. Recent reviews are sparse and offer little detail.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
The homestay struggles with basic upkeep. Most reviewers report dirty conditions and rodent problems; one found it comfortable, but the 2.2-star average and repeated complaints about lack of cleaning suggest these are structural issues. Location details are also disputed online.
One guest found the place spacious and livable for the price, though below hotel standard. Another had a poor stay with a broken AC unit and missing iron, with maintenance complaints ignored until checkout.
Guests consistently praise the property for its cleanliness and pleasant appearance. The small number of recent reviews limits visibility into current operations, but available feedback is uniformly positive.
Only three reviews are available, split between comfort and heat complaints. One guest found the stay safe and easy but noted the rooms were hot; another praised comfort. The limited feedback makes it hard to judge consistency.
Reviewers praise clean, spacious rooms with comfortable beds and air-conditioning. Limited review detail and mixed ratings suggest inconsistent guest experience; some flagged limited water access and contacted the business with difficulty.
Reviewers describe an affordable, hospitable homestay in a local village setting, though experiences vary sharply. Serious concerns about the owner entering private spaces without permission and ongoing water supply strain during busy periods have prompted one-star ratings, while others praise value and warmth.
Half the reviews are one or two stars, citing foul odours, dirty toilets with abandoned items, and bedding that didn't match photos. Guests report the owner rarely answered calls, failed to explain room counts or fees upfront, and staff entered rooms without permission during checkout.
Most recent reviewers report severe neglect: moldy rooms, non-functional utilities, broken furniture, and dirty bathrooms make this unsuitable for most guests. One older review praised cleanliness and location, but the consistent pattern of maintenance failures and mold damage across multiple visits suggests those conditions no longer hold.
Safety concerns dominate feedback, chiefly a locking system that traps residents indoors. One reviewer praised cleanliness and family-friendly atmosphere, but multiple serious issues (plastic mattress, slippery bathroom, missing fixtures, hard-to-find entrance) and inadequate basic amenities undermine confidence.
Limited review evidence: one guest noted cleanliness fell short of expectations, though another found the price fair for a short stay. Details on specific rooms, amenities, or service are sparse.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Mixed feedback from sparse review history. One guest found facilities inadequate and left dissatisfied; another noted basic acceptability. Evidence is too thin to guide booking confidently.
Reviewers describe a romantic, relaxing setting suitable for families. Limited recent review data makes it hard to assess consistency or current operations.
Review evidence is limited. The business operates as a homestay in Sungai Petani offering basic accommodation with air-conditioned and non-air-conditioned rooms, plus shared facilities like washing machines and carrom games.
All four reviews rate this homestay one or two stars. Guests report high prices paired with missing basics: no drinking water, no iron or board, no cleaning supplies despite listing them. The property was dirty, and hosts appeared dismissive of complaints.
A property with appealing grounds and views that consistently falls short on maintenance and cleanliness. Reviewers repeatedly encounter a mossy, unusable pool, dirty bathrooms and floors, broken door locks, and slow water pressure. At higher prices (RM230-240), guests feel cheated; lower rates (RM100) improve sentiment slightly. Pests including rats, snakes, and lizards have been reported. Staff responsiveness appears weak. The mismatch between promotional photos and actual conditions emerges as a recurring frustration. Families seeking budget group accommodation should expect neglected facilities and minimal housekeeping rather than the advertised aesthetic.
Review evidence is limited. The business lists entire home rentals (8 to 12 guests), group bookings, and work-friendly amenities including Wi-Fi and desks in Batu Kawan.
Review evidence for this business is limited. Their website lists family-friendly and Muslim-friendly homestay accommodation with gluten-free baking services near Nibong Tebal.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Review detail is limited. The business lists 3-bedroom family and couple accommodation with full air conditioning, kitchen access, and parking for 2 vehicles in Batu Gajah.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Review evidence is too limited to assess this property reliably. Their website lists rooms with AC, TV, full-size beds, and en-suite showers starting from MXN523 per night, but no guest reviews are available to confirm quality or experience.
Last updated 2026-08-27